Intrahospital Transport Practice in Pediatric Intensive Care Units
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request
    Research Article
    P: 139-142
    August 2023

    Intrahospital Transport Practice in Pediatric Intensive Care Units

    J Pediatr Emerg Intensive Care Med 2023;10(2):139-142
    1. Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Nurse in Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Antalya, Turkey
    2. Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Intensive Care, Antalya, Turkey
    No information available.
    No information available
    Received Date: 10.10.2022
    Accepted Date: 30.03.2023
    Publish Date: 31.05.2023
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request

    ABSTRACT

    Introduction:

    Critically ill children often require transport during diagnosis and treatment procedures during intensive care hospitalization. With this study, it was aimed to evaluate the practice of transport and the problems encountered during transport in pediatric intensive care units in Turkey.

    Methods:

    A questionnaire consisting of 18 questions was filled in with internet access by the head nurses of the pediatric intensive care unit, who agreed to participate in the study. Responses to questions about the characteristics of the participating centers, transport practices, problems encountered during transport, interventions and the registration system were evaluated.

    Results:

    A total of 29 tertiary pediatric intensive care units from 8 provinces in Turkey were included in the study. The mean number of beds was 14. In most pediatric intensive care units, 5 to 10 patients (51.7%) were transferred within 1 week. It was observed that the most patients were transported to the inpatient service (89.7%), followed by the operating room (69%). There was a protocol for patient transport in 69% of the units. The transport decision was made by the responsible specialist physician at a rate of 96.6%. 65% of the participants stated that the transport was recorded on a form. Transports were accompanied by 93% nurses, 86% allied health personnel, and 79% doctors. In 20 centers (69%), transport was possible with an invasive mechanical ventilator and 11 (37.9%) with a non-invasive mechanical ventilator. The most common problem encountered during transportation was the inadequacy of the physical conditions of the hospital (48.3%). There were 4 (13.8%) participants who encountered problems during patient transport in the last week. It was stated that the oxygen tube was depleted in one of them, and respiratory arrest developed in another patient.

    Conclusio

    n:In this study, it was shown that; In our country, there are significant differences in intrahospital transport conditions, transport teams, equipment used during transport between centers. Transport standards should be established and these should take into account the conditions of our country. For these, compliance and monitoring mechanisms should be established.

    Keywords: Intrahospital transport, child, intensive care

    Introduction

    Pediatric intensive care units are the places where critically ill children are followed up and treated, their care is maintained, and the most complex biomedical devices of hospitals are available. And, advanced technology and knowledge and performance to use this technology are required in these units. In pediatric intensive care units, a well-equipped team for emergency intervention, invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilators for advanced respiratory support treatments, infusion pumps for appropriate treatment, and advanced monitoring devices are needed. From this point of view, the most reliable place for critically ill children is the pediatric intensive care unit. However, critically ill children often require transport during diagnosis and treatment, both before and after admission to the intensive care unit. During transport, morbidity and mortality may develop due to problems that may arise from the patient, equipment and team. Complications can be encountered at a rate of 6-71% during in-hospital transport.1 Various studies are carried out and pre-transport checklists are created in order to ensure patient safety and to prevent medical errors in transport all over the world.2 In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the transport procedures performed in pediatric intensive care units in Turkey and the problems encountered during transport.

    Material and Methods

    A questionnaire consisting of 18 questions was filled in with internet access by the nurses responsible for the pediatric intensive care units of 29 centers in Turkey, who agreed to participate in the study. Features of the participating centers (number of beds, number of transports in a week, transport units), transport-related features (determinants of transport decision, presence of transport protocol, members of the transport team, emergency bag and its contents, monitorization used during transport, oxygenation, drug infusion systems), problems encountered during transport, interventions and answers to questions about the registration system were evaluated.

    Statistical Analysis

    Study data were evaluated using SPSS 23 software. Categorical data were expressed as numbers and percentages. The study was conducted with the approval of the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Akdeniz University (24.08.2022, no: KAEK-500).

    Results

    A total of 29 tertiary pediatric intensive care units from 8 provinces in Turkey agreed to be included in the study. While 14 health centers were university hospitals, the others were training and research hospitals. The average number of beds was 14. It was observed that 5-10 patients (51.7%) were transferred within a week in most of the pediatric intensive care units participating in the study. It was determined that most of the transfers were made to the inpatient service (89.7%), and the second place was to the operating room (69%) (Table 1). 69% of the units had a protocol for patient transport, the transport decision was made by the responsible specialist physician in 96.6%, and transport records were kept in 65%. Postoperative patient transport was performed by the intensive care team and the relevant surgical department team at a rate of 37.9% (Table 2). Each unit had an emergency bag, in which there were drugs such as adrenaline, saline and sedo-analgesics (Table 3). The participation rate of nurses in patient transports was 93%, auxiliary staff accompanied at the rate of 86%, and the doctors at the rate of 79%. The most common problem encountered during transport was the inadequacy of hospital’s physical conditions (48.3%) (Figure 1). Twenty (69%) centers had the opportunity to transport with invasive mechanical ventilation and 11 (37.9%) centers with non-invasive mechanical ventilation. The rate of using infusion pumps was 3.4%. For monitoring purposes, transport monitor was used with a rate of 82.8%. Four (13.8%) of the 29 nurses who answered the questionnaire stated that they had encountered problems during the patient transfers in the last week, and these were depletion of oxygen tube in one patient, development of respiratory arrest in one patient, and adverse events related to the physical conditions of the hospital in two patients. For the case of a possible cardiac or pulmonary arrest during the transfer, 51.7% of the participants stated that they would start the intervention at the place where patients were and take them back to the intensive care unit.

    Table 1
    Table 2
    Table 3
    Figure 1

    Discussion

    In this study, the situation regarding in-hospital critical patient transport in tertiary pediatric intensive care units in our country was presented cross-sectionally. In the presented study, 30.1% of the units included in the study did not have a transport protocol. It was stated that all centers participating in the study had an emergency bag, and this bag contained the necessary materials for airway management and the necessary drugs for resuscitation. It was stated that the patient transfer was accompanied by 93% nurses, 86% auxiliary staff, and 79% doctors. It has been stated in the guidelines published for patient transfer that intensive care units should have written protocols.3 When emergency or unexpected situations occur during in-hospital transport, it is vital to have team coordination, communication, trained personnel, properly working equipment, adequate documentation and relevant checklists. The transport team should be familiar with the equipment used, and should be experienced in emergency airway, ventilation and resuscitation management.4,5 In addition to the necessary equipment and oxygen supply for emergency airway management, monitoring systems that can measure blood pressure and cardiac functions should be available without exception. Essential resuscitation drugs for cardiac arrest or arrhythmia should be available in sufficient quantities in the emergency bag.3

    In our study, it was determined that patients were most frequently transported to clinics and operating rooms, and the most common problems were related to the physical conditions of the hospital. The physical conditions of the pediatric intensive care unit and its location close to the operating room are important for the rapid and convenient transportation of patients who require emergency intervention. Patient transport becomes more risky in clinics located in different places, distant or requiring ambulance transport.

    In our study, 20 centers (69%) had the opportunity to transport with invasive mechanical ventilation and 11 (37.9%) centers with non-invasive mechanical ventilation during transport. A large proportion of patients followed in intensive care units, trauma patients, and perioperative patients require mechanical ventilation, and this may result in airway and pulmonary complications during in-hospital transport. Although symptomatic pneumothorax and atelectasis are seen more frequently, the risk of pneumothorax may increase 2 times and the occurrence of atelectasis may increase approximately 3 times.6-9 Malposition of the intubation tube is also an important condition that is often not noticed but can cause serious problems. In a study conducted on newborns in the literature, it was found that the intubation tube was positioned incorrectly at a rate of 50% after transport.10 In the study of Parmentier-Decrucq et al.9 on the group of 262 mechanically ventilated patients, 0.4% of all adverse events during in-hospital transport were accidental extubation, 8.8% were related to low oxygen saturation (it was stated that patients who needed positive end-expiratory pressure over 6 cm H2O constituted an important risk group) and 17.6% were related to airway equipment events (including inappropriate alarm settings, probe disengagement, and battery problems). Similar to this study, many studies have shown that the most common adverse events are equipment-related.11,12 In addition, although it is not very common, accidental extubation is an adverse event that should be considered because it may result in the death of the patient. Another important issue is that when the transport of the mechanically ventilated patient with a balloon mask or a transport ventilator was evaluated, changes in some parameters (more than 10 mmHg in pCO2, more than 0.05 units in pH) were found in arterial blood gas analysis with balloon mask.2 Therefore, we think that choosing a ventilator would be safer.

    In our study, it was observed that there was a very low rate of the use of infusion pumps during transport. In addition to the possibility of medication errors during patient transport, interruption of vital infusions or administration of wrong doses (fluid therapy, sedation, analgesia, vasopressor, inotropic, antiarrhythmic, etc.) bring great risks. Hypotension, hypertension, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and blood gas changes may be encountered. Changes in intravenous fluid infusions, interruptions in vasoactive drug administration, as well as altered circulatory dynamics and end-organ perfusion can cause disruptions in systemic acid-base balance.12 Acidotic conditions may alter vasopressor activity and predispose patients to arrhythmias, resulting in cardiac arrest. For this reason, to reduce or even eliminate these risks, it will be useful to ensure the continuity of the infusion during transport, if possible, with infusion pumps at the appropriate dose, and to get their calibrations made and ensure them to be fully charged if the infusion pumps are used.

    Study Limitations

    This study has some limitations. Due to the fact that it is a cross-sectional survey study and the number of participating centers is limited, we think that it does not accurately reflect the emergency transport management of critically ill children, but it is informative. For this reason, we suggest that further prospective studies involving more centers will be beneficial.

    Conclusion

    Critically ill children are at risk for significant adverse events such as airway or pulmonary complications, hemodynamic deteriorations (including cardiac arrest), nosocomial infections, acid-base imbalances, and glucose abnormalities during in-hospital transport. In this study, it was determined that in-hospital transport conditions, the transport teams, and the equipment used during transport in our country differed significantly among health centers. Transport standards should be created by taking the conditions of our country into account, and compliance inspection mechanisms should be established.

    Information: This study was presented as an oral presentation at the 16th Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Intensive Care Congress, 12th Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Intensive Care Nursing Congress and won the third prize.

    Ethics

    Ethics Committee Approval: The study was conducted with the approval of the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Akdeniz University (24.08.2022, no: KAEK-500).

    Informed Consent: It was a survey work.

    Peer-review: Internally and externally peer-reviewed.

    Authorship Contributions

    Surgical and Medical Practices: P.A., N.Ü.T., A.K., Concept: N.Ü.T., O.D., E.Ç., Design: P.A., N.Ü.T., O.D., E.Ç., A.K., Data Collection or Processing: M.Ü., P.A., N.Ü.T., Analysis or Interpretation: M.Ü., N.Ü.T., O.D., A.K., Literature Search: M.Ü., P.A., N.Ü.T., O.D., Writing: M.Ü., P.A., N.Ü.T., O.D.

    Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

    Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

    References

    1
    Özgür Horoz Ö, Yıldızdaş D, Menemencioğlu A. Evaluation of the Events Due to Intra-Hospital Transportation of Critically lll Pediatric Patients. J Pediatr Emerg Intens Care Med. 2014;1:25-30.
    2
    Knight PH, Maheshwari N, Hussain J, Scholl M, Hughes M, et al. Complications during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: Focus on risk identification and prevention. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2015;5:256-64.
    3
    Warren J, Fromm RE Jr, Orr RA, Rotello LC, Horst HM; American College of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines for the inter- and intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:256-62.
    4
    Jarden RJ, Quirke S. Improving safety and documentation in intrahospital transport: development of an intrahospital transport tool for critically ill patients. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2010;26:101-7.
    5
    Bérubé M, Bernard F, Marion H, Parent J, Thibault M, et al. Impact of a preventive programme on the occurrence of incidents during the transport of critically ill patients. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013;29:9-19.
    6
    de Lassence A, Timsit JF, Tafflet M, Azoulay E, Jamali S, et al. Pneumothorax in the intensive care unit: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:5-13.
    7
    Garrouste Orgeas M, Timsit JF, Soufir L, Tafflet M, Adrie C, et al. Impact of adverse events on outcomes in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:2041-7.
    8
    Schwebel C, Clec'h C, Magne S, Minet C, Garrouste-Orgeas M, et al. Safety of intrahospital transport in ventilated critically ill patients: a multicenter cohort study*. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1919-28.
    9
    Parmentier-Decrucq E, Poissy J, Favory R, Nseir S, Onimus T, et al. Adverse events during intrahospital transport of critically ill patients: incidence and risk factors. Ann Intensive Care. 2013;3:10.
    10
    Sanchez-Pinto N, Giuliano JS, Schwartz HP, Garrett L, Gothard MD, et al. The impact of postintubation chest radiograph during pediatric and neonatal critical care transport. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14:e213-7.
    11
    Venkategowda PM, Rao SM, Mutkule DP, Taggu AN. Unexpected events occurring during the intra-hospital transport of critically ill ICU patients. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18:354-7.
    12
    Papson JP, Russell KL, Taylor DM. Unexpected events during the intrahospital transport of critically ill patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:574-7.
    2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House