Comparison of Axillary Digital Thermometer with Smart Fever Measurement
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request
    Research Article
    P: 1-5
    April 2020

    Comparison of Axillary Digital Thermometer with Smart Fever Measurement

    J Pediatr Emerg Intensive Care Med 2020;7(1):1-5
    1. Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, İzmir, Türkiye
    No information available.
    No information available
    Received Date: 09.08.2019
    Accepted Date: 02.09.2019
    Publish Date: 20.02.2020
    PDF
    Cite
    Share
    Request

    ABSTRACT

    Introduction:

    The best method of body temperature measurement in children has been investigated for many years. It has become possible to make non-invasive continuous temperature measurement by using smartphones, to record the values and to give warning in case of fever with the technological developments in recent years. Nevertheless, there is no data on the accuracy of body temperature measurements using this method. We aimed to compare measurements made by the smartphone applications and using the axillary digital thermometers.

    Methods:

    This was a cross-sectional observational study. All patients, who were admitted to the pediatric emergency department between 1 July 2017 and 30 September 2017 with fever, were included. Demographic characteristics and the diagnosis of the patients were recorded. The body temperatures measured using smartphone applications and those using axillary digital thermometers were compared.

    Results:

    During the study period, 234 measurements were done in 53 patients. The mean age of the patients was 58±51 months. Thirty (57%) patients were male and eleven (21%) were infant. The most frequent diagnoses were upper respiratory tract infection (20, 38%) and acute gastroenteritis (12, 23%). There was no significant difference between smartphone applications and axillary digital thermometers in detecting fever (p=0.754). The mean body temperature value taken using axillary digital thermometers and smartphone applications were 37.07±0.85 °C and 37.16±0.89 °C, respectively. Both measurements were strongly correlated with each other (r=0.874, p<0.001). In the fever period, the mean body temperature measured by axillary digital thermometers and smartphone applications was 38.14±0.56 °C and 38.24±0.55 °C, respectively. These values were also strongly correlated with each other (r=0.745, p<0.001). Similar results were also obtained in infants.

    Conclusion:

    Smartphone applications seem to be a superior method that can be used reliably, anywhere and in all age groups, however, further studies are warranted to introduce this method into routine use.

    Keywords: Fever, smartphone application, skin sensor, thermometer

    References

    1
    Nield LS and Kamat D. Fever. In: Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, Geme JW, Schor NF, eds. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 20th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 2016.p.1277-9.
    2
    Kara A. Ateş. In: Hasanoğlu E, Düşünsel R, Bideci A (eds). Temel Pediatri. Ankara: Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri; 2010.p.275-81.
    3
    Nield LS and Kamat D. Fever without a focus. In: Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, Geme JW, Schor NF, eds. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics. 20th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 2016.p.1280-7.
    4
    Niven DJ, Gaudet JE, Laupland KB, Mrklas KJ, Roberts DJ, et al. Accuracy of peripheral thermometers for estimating temperature: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:768-77.
    5
    Işler A, Aydin R, Tutar Güven S, Günay S. Comparison of temporal artery to mercury and digital temperature measurement in pediatrics. Int Emerg Nurs. 2014;22:165-8.
    6
    Geijer H, Udumyan R, Lohse G, Nilsagard Y. Temperature measurements with a temporal scanner: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e009509.
    7
    Zhen C, Xia Z, Ya Jun Z, Long L, Jian S, et al. Accuracy of infrared tympanic thermometry used in the diagnosis of Fever in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015;54:114-26.
    8
    Odinaka KK, Edelu BO, Nwolisa CE, Amamilo IB, Okolo SN. Temporal artery thermometry in children younger than 5 years: a comparison with rectal thermometry. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014;30:867-70.
    9
    Ataş Berksoy E, Bağ Ö, Yazici S, Çelik T. Use of noncontact infrared thermography to measure temperature in children in a triage room. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e9737.
    10
    Fortuna EL, Carney MM, Macy M, Stanley RM, Younger JG, et al. Accuracy of non-contact infrared thermometry versus rectal thermometry in young children evaluated in the emergency department for fever. J Emerg Nurs. 2010;36:101-4.
    11
    https://www.enfasmart.com/2019.
    12
    http://www.oit.uci.edu/telephone/cell-safety/hands-free-devices/ 2019.
    13
    https://www.feversmart.com/2018.
    14
    Teller J, Ragazzi M, Simonetti GD, Lava SA. Accuracy of tympanic and forehead thermometers in private paediatric practice. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:e80-3.
    15
    Selent MU, Molinari NM, Baxter A, Nguyen AV, Siegelson H, et al. Mass screening for fever in children: a comparison of 3 infrared thermal detection systems. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29:305-13.
    16
    Bayhan C, Özsürekçi Y, Tekçam N, Güloğlu A, Ehliz G, et al. Comparison of infrared tympanic thermometer with non-contact infrared thermometer. J Pediatr Inf. 2014;8:52-5.
    17
    Teran CG, Torrez-Llanos J, Teran-Miranda TE, Balderrama C, Shah NS, et al. Clinical accuracy of a non-contact infrared skin thermometer in paediatric practice. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38:471-6.
    18
    Devrim I, Kara A, Ceyhan M, Tezer H, Uludağ AK, et al. Measurement accuracy of fever by tympanic and axillary thermometry. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2007;23:16-9.
    19
    Batra P, Goyal S. Comparison of rectal, axillary, tympanic, and temporal artery thermometry in the pediatric emergency room. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29:63-6.
    20
    Greenes DS, Fleisher GR. When body temperature changes, does rectal temperature lag? J Pediatr. 2004;144:824-6.
    21
    Bahorski J, Repasky T, Ranner D, Fields A, Jackson M, et al. Temperature measurement in pediatrics: a comparison of the rectal method versus the temporal artery method. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012;27:243-7.
    22
    Craig JV, Lancaster GA, Taylor S, Williamson PR, Smyth RL. Infrared ear thermometry compared with rectal thermometry in children: a systematic review. Lancet. 2002;360:603-9.
    23
    Holzhauer JK, Reith V, Sawin KJ, Yen K. Evaluation of temporal artery thermometry in children 3–36 months old. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2009;14:239-44.
    24
    Reynolds M, Bonham L, Gueck M, Hammond K, Lowery J, et al. Are temporal artery temperatures accurate enough to replace rectal temperature measurement in pediatric ED patients? J Emerg Nurs. 2014;40:46-50.
    25
    Uslu S, Ozdemir H, Bulbul A, Comert S, Bolat F, et al. A comparison of different methods of temperature measurements in sick newborns. J Trop Pediatr. 2011;57:418-23.
    2024 ©️ Galenos Publishing House