ABSTRACT
Foreign body ingestion is a common household accident in children. Interestingly, 10-20% of such cases require endoscopy. Perforation is the most serious complication of endoscopic procedures, and patients with esophageal perforations can develop mediastinitis and mediastinal abscesses. Early diagnosis reduces mortality, but diagnosis is often delayed because patients who develop mediastinal abscesses present differently. A 9-year-old female patient was admitted to the hospital with abdominal pain. Remarkably, she was in the opisthotonus position. When her history was analyzed in detail, she was found to have recently undergone endoscopy for removal of an ingested coin. She was diagnosed with mediastinal abscess by thoracic magnetic resonance imaging. In this report, we describe the unique case of a patient admitted to the emergency department with abdominal pain who developed mediastinal abscess after endoscopic removal of an ingested coin.
Introduction
Esophageal perforation is often caused by trauma, but, nowadays, the most common cause is iatrogenic; perforations develop during endoscopy with diagnostic or curative intent.1,2 The most serious complication of endoscopy is perforation, which occurs in 0.03-0.1% of all patients. Fulminant mediastinitis and mediastinal abscesses have been reported in 1% of patients with esophageal perforations.3 Injuries to the esophagus are routinely classified by location: Cervical, thoracic, and intraperitoneal. If esophageal perforation occurs, the location is not very important; however, location is extremely important in mediastinal contamination and infection. A perforation can be fatal if not diagnosed early and properly treated.4,5
Herein, we present a case of a mediastinal abscess caused by iatrogenic injury; a patient suffering from acute abdominal pain presented uniquely. The report shows that an esophageal perforation caused by an iatrogenic injury can be safely treated conservatively.
Case
A 9-year-old female patient was admitted to the emergency department at our hospital because of abdominal pain of 1-day in duration. She was in the opisthotonus position and was sensitive to abdominal palpation. However, all other systems and vital findings were normal. When her history was analyzed in detail, she was found to have undergone upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy for removal of an ingested coin in another hospital 2 days prior. She had accidentally swallowed a coin, but within 6 hours, the coin had been endoscopically removed without any apparent problem. She was discharged after 2 hours and began to eat, but complained of abdominal pain over the next 10 hours. The laboratory data were as follows: White blood cells, 13.930x103/µL; neutrophils, 10.250x103/µL; hemoglobin, 12.7 g/dL; hematocrit, 39%; and platelets, 336.000x103/µL. The liver and kidney function test results were normal. The amylase level was 49 IU/L, and the C-reactive protein level was 7.48 mg/dL. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 68 mm/h, and the full urine analysis was normal. No pathological finding was evident on abdominal or chest x-ray. An abdominal ultrasound scan was normal. A pediatric surgeon was consulted to rule out acute abdominal pathology. Emergency surgical intervention was not indicated. Although the classical symptoms and findings were lacking, mediastinitis was considered because of the possibility of iatrogenic perforation during endoscopy. The patient had no complaint before endoscopy; her complaints began and progressed 1-2 hours after endoscopy. Thoracic and mediastinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) supported the diagnosis of a mediastinal abscess of the thoracoabdominal junction toward the left para-aortic region of the subcarinal areas of the middle and lower mediastinum (Figure 1). A mass lesion with a thick wall and intensely contrasting signal changes was evident upon endoscopy. She was deemed to have been iatrogenically injured during esophagoscopy. She was referred to the pediatric surgery unit; oral feeding was discontinued, and intravenous meropenem, vancomycin, fluconazole, and metronidazole (antibiotics) were given. She was not permitted to take any liquid or food orally; she received total parenteral nutrition. The images were assessed in a radiology council. The abscess was considered to be well confined, not invading the surrounding tissue, and showing no sign of mediastinitis. Surgery was not considered because of possible iatrogenic complications and the fragile thin-walled nature of the esophagus. On the sixth day of admission, her clinical and laboratory results showed that she had responded well to the antibiotics, and she underwent esophageal fluoroscopic imaging. No leakage was apparent, and oral feeding began on the seventh day. This was well tolerated, and the declines in clinical signs and symptoms were followed by regression of the lesion as evidenced by MRI performed on day 18 (Figure 2). Antibiotic treatment was completed by 3 weeks, and she was discharged.
Discussion
In childhood, foreign body ingestion is a common household accident. These cases rarely require endoscopy. In approximately 92.5% of cases encountered, the foreign objects are passed in the stool without the need for any medical initiative. The nature of the foreign body ingested and its location after settling in the gastrointestinal tract are of importance when exploring treatment options.6-10
Injuries caused by ingestion of a foreign body develop in the physiological stenosis of the pharyngoesophageal area, the cross section of the aortic arch, and the cardio-esophageal region.1 If the foreign body remains in the esophagus for 2-4 weeks, a pressure lesion may develop. To prevent this, endoscopic procedures are required. During such procedures, mediastinal infections may be triggered by esophageal injuries.4 Such cases present to emergency departments with different clinical symptoms. One presentation is abdominal pain combined with the opisthotonus position, as in our case. Early diagnosis effectively reduces mortality. Generally, fever, palpitations, and chest pains are the most common complaints.5 However, diagnosis can be delayed because of variations in clinical presentation. Our patient complained of abdominal pain 12 hours after endoscopic to removal of the ingested coin. She was admitted in the opisthotonus position, which is a remarkable example of a unique clinical presentation. Patients may present with acute abdominal pain, as did our case, depending on the location of the esophageal perforation. Thus, if any sign or symptom develops after an endoscopic procedure, a diagnosis of mediastinitis or a mediastinal abscess should be kept in mind.
Differences in presenting complaints, analyses of patient histories, and further investigations of the complaints are important in terms of differential diagnosis. Typically, general antibiotics alone are not enough when treating a mediastinal abscess or mediastinitis. Surgical drainage of the abscess is required using a cervical or thoracic procedure.3,11 In our case, pediatric surgeons preferred to not operate because the infection was well confined (thus not spreading), there was no sign of mediastinitis, and they sought to avoid possible iatrogenic complications.
Early diagnosis of a mediastinal abscess changes the treatment strategy and reduces mortality. Therefore, in patients with a history of endoscopy, a mediastinal abscess and/or mediastinitis (rare complications of esophageal perforation) should be considered during differential diagnosis. If the diagnosis is made before significant contamination develops, an esophageal perforation can be safely treated conservatively.
Ethics
Informed Consent: Consent form was obtained from the patient.
Peer-review: Externally and Internally peer-reviewed.
Authorship Contributions
Surgical and Medical Practices: Şenol Öztürk, Emel Aktaş Berksoy, Özlem Bekem Soylu, Feray Arı, Concept: Emel Aktaş Berksoy, Design: Emel Aktaş Berksoy, Data Collection or Processing: Feray Arı, Murat Arı, Analysis or Interpretation: Emel Berksoy, Tanju Çelik, Literature Search: Emel Aktaş Berksoy, Miray Karakoyun, Writing: Emel Aktaş Berksoy, Feray Arı.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.